<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!--Generated by Squarespace Site Server v5.9.2 (http://www.squarespace.com/) on Tue, 09 Mar 2010 22:03:20 GMT--><rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:rss="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/"><rss:channel rdf:about="http://www.cadolphmoores.com/blog/"><rss:title>Home</rss:title><rss:link>http://www.cadolphmoores.com/blog/</rss:link><rss:description></rss:description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><dc:date>2010-03-09T22:03:20Z</dc:date><admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://www.squarespace.com/">Squarespace Site Server v5.9.2 (http://www.squarespace.com/)</admin:generatorAgent><rss:items><rdf:Seq><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.cadolphmoores.com/blog/2010/3/8/little-known-nicknames-for-jesus.html"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.cadolphmoores.com/blog/2010/3/5/c-adolphs-2010-oscar-predictions.html"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.cadolphmoores.com/blog/2010/3/3/moon.html"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.cadolphmoores.com/blog/2010/3/1/the-russians-are-still-coming.html"/></rdf:Seq></rss:items></rss:channel><rss:item rdf:about="http://www.cadolphmoores.com/blog/2010/3/8/little-known-nicknames-for-jesus.html"><rss:title>Little Known Nicknames For Jesus</rss:title><rss:link>http://www.cadolphmoores.com/blog/2010/3/8/little-known-nicknames-for-jesus.html</rss:link><dc:creator>C. Adolph Moores</dc:creator><dc:date>2010-03-08T16:38:48Z</dc:date><dc:subject></dc:subject><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="full-image-block ssNonEditable"><span><img src="http://www.cadolphmoores.com/storage/jesus_cross__.jpg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1268067481568" alt="" /></span></span></p>
<ol>
<li>Zoundzie</li>
<li>Patches</li>
<li>Chip</li>
<li>Holes</li>
<li>Pontius' Bitch</li>
<li>The Christ-o-nator</li>
<li>Cross Meat</li>
<li>DFH</li>
<li>Nails Lofgren</li>
<li>Kike</li>
<li>El Nazarino</li>
<li>Trixie</li>
<li>JC Smoove</li>
<li>IMGOD 2000</li>
<li>Junior</li>
<li>Piney J.</li>
<li>Splinters</li>
<li>Daddy's Boy</li>
<li>Wall Art</li>
<li>Tebowdawg</li>
<li>Whippin' Post</li>
<li>Zombie</li>
<li>MS. Aya (stage name for drag act)</li>
<li>Luv Doctor</li>
<li>Transubstanto</li>
</ol>]]></content:encoded></rss:item><rss:item rdf:about="http://www.cadolphmoores.com/blog/2010/3/5/c-adolphs-2010-oscar-predictions.html"><rss:title>C. Adolph's 2010 Oscar Predictions</rss:title><rss:link>http://www.cadolphmoores.com/blog/2010/3/5/c-adolphs-2010-oscar-predictions.html</rss:link><dc:creator>C. Adolph Moores</dc:creator><dc:date>2010-03-05T21:09:26Z</dc:date><dc:subject></dc:subject><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="full-image-float-right ssNonEditable"><img style="width: 150px;" src="http://www.cadolphmoores.com/storage/Oscar.jpg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1267824527669" alt="" /></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 140%;"><strong>Updated results below, at end of post!!!!!!!</strong></span></p>
<p>I&rsquo;m just going to come right out and say it. No decent film lover or cinema enthusiast should take anything related to the <a href="http://www.oscars.org/">Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences</a> seriously. It&rsquo;s a rigged, multi-faceted con game of celebrity ego, shallow popularity, industry onanism and shady horse trading.<br />Rarely, if ever, are the most deserving films and/or people awarded and significantly less often are the proper films and people even nominated.<br /><span class="full-image-float-left ssNonEditable"><img style="width: 100px;" src="http://www.cadolphmoores.com/storage/louis_b_mayer.jpg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1267824582340" alt="" /></span>It&rsquo;s an MTV/Nickelodeon awards ceremony for dimwitted adult philistines.<br />Which is not to say that the gambling possibilities involved in such an endeavor are not ripe for the plucking.<br />Over the years I have cast my lot into various Oscar pools, ran a few of my own, won a few, been cheated out of a few more, but always managed to make a good showing. Which is not typically true for those with the breadth of film knowledge and aesthetic purity that I possess. Generally, impeccable taste and an undying belief that not every year has to turn into an artistic mind fuck for the truly talented tends to create gaping errors in Oscar pool judgment. Better off to peer into the Hollywood abyss with a cynical eye and realize that pool winners are born from the calculative appreciation of knowing what the vapid cesspool of entertainment professionals will likely vote for above the Pollyanna naivet&eacute; of believing they will do what is just and true. Or, if you are a complete idiot, choosing your personal favorite to win, assuring you a crushing defeat.&nbsp; &nbsp;<br />This year will be a bit different for me. Once upon a time I made it my business to see most, if not all, of the nominated films prior to the ceremony, thinking this would give me the ultimate edge in prognostication. I found over the years that it could easily be argued that ingesting all of the nominees beforehand was inversely damaging to one's ability to predict the winners. Too many personal issues get in the way of sound, cool-headed, bloodless judgment. Especially with the technical categories. One tiny glimpse of a finely crafted garment of chic modernism and your temporary bias could overcome the inevitable fact that stodgy English period pieces almost always win for "Costume Design". Similarly, having seen the four astoundingly better performances by other supporting actresses in 1990 would have cost you. Simply for doing what was decent and sensible by not voting for Whoopi Goldberg in <em>Ghost</em>.<br />And this year is particularly noxious for not including what should have been a no-brainer, shoo-in for &ldquo;Best Picture&rdquo; along with many other awards - <a href="http://www.theroad-movie.com/"><em>The Road</em></a>. Its lack of a single nomination reeks of politics. <br />It&rsquo;s all a fool&rsquo;s game.<br />Fortunately, I have a sixth sense for fools.<br />So hop up on the C. Adolph Oscar Pool Bandwagon and come on in for the big win. <br />Without further ado:<br /><br /><span style="font-size: 130%;"><strong>C. Adolph&rsquo;s 2010 Academy Award Predictions</strong></span><br /><br /><strong><span class="full-image-float-right ssNonEditable"><img style="width: 150px;" src="http://www.cadolphmoores.com/storage/hurtlocker.jpg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1267824019596" alt="" /></span>Best Picture</strong> - This is a perfect example of how abysmally self-gratifying this has all become for the motion picture industry. There has been a slew of films in this category recently that aren&rsquo;t even good enough to be nominated, let alone win (<em>Slumdog Millionaire, Crash, Million Dollar Baby, Chicago, A Beautiful Mind</em>, ad nausea), so the Academy&rsquo;s answer to this dilemma is to expand the fucking field to ten nominees. &ldquo;What&rsquo;s that you say? Your plate of shit is displeasing? Let&rsquo;s just spoon some more on there for you.&rdquo;<br />Winner: <em>The Hurt Locker</em><br /><br /><strong><span class="full-image-float-left ssNonEditable"><img style="width: 150px;" src="http://www.cadolphmoores.com/storage/jeff bridges.jpg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1267824038610" alt="" /></span>Best Actor</strong> - Two man race. Clooney&rsquo;s losing wind.<br />Winner: Jeff Bridges<br /><br /><strong><span class="full-image-float-right ssNonEditable"><img style="width: 150px;" src="http://www.cadolphmoores.com/storage/Sandra-Bullock.jpg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1267824066249" alt="" /></span>Best Actress</strong> - Been a long time for Streep (who was robbed for <em>Doubt</em>) and Julia Child is a beloved icon, but the Hollywood race often goes to the shallow.<br />Winner: Sandra Bullock<br /><br /><strong><span class="full-image-float-left ssNonEditable"><img style="width: 125px;" src="http://www.cadolphmoores.com/storage/james-cameron.jpg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1267824156914" alt="" /></span>Best Director</strong> - &lsquo;Bout time a chick won this thing. Hell, there&rsquo;s a black President. Might as well be female directors. I just wish Bigelow&rsquo;s oeuvre was a little more impressive. I mean - <em>Mission Zero, K-19: The Widowmaker, Strange Days</em> and<em> Point Break</em>? C&rsquo;mon. Renny Harlin deserves an Oscar by those standards. She did have to fuck James Cameron for a few years, however. She&rsquo;s probably earned it. God knows the evil kinks that man must demand to be satisfied.<br />Winner: Kathryn Bigelow<br /><br /><strong>Best Supporting Actor</strong> - Way too much buzz on Waltz for him not to win.<br />Winner: Christoph Waltz<br /><br /><strong><span class="full-image-float-left ssNonEditable"><img style="width: 125px;" src="http://www.cadolphmoores.com/storage/kubrick.jpg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1267824217874" alt="" /></span><span class="full-image-float-right ssNonEditable"><img src="http://www.cadolphmoores.com/storage/MoNique.jpg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1267824240078" alt="" width="112" height="131" /></span>Best Supporting Actress</strong> - So you don&rsquo;t think the Academy Awards and all it stands for is so much <a href="http://www.filmsite.org/noawards3.html#6">bilge water</a>? After Sunday night - Number of Oscars: Stanley Kubrick - 0, Mo&rsquo;Nique - 1.<br />Winner: Mo&rsquo;Nique<br /><br /><strong>Best Original Screenplay</strong> - I&rsquo;m leaning <em>Hurt Locker</em> here and if it does beat out <em>Inglorious Basterds</em>&nbsp; for this it should win &ldquo;Best Picture&rdquo; over <em>Avatar</em>.<br />Winner: <em>Hurt Locker<br /></em><br /><strong>Best Adapted Screenplay</strong> - No contest.<br />Winner: <em>Up in the Air</em><br /><br /><strong><span class="full-image-float-left ssNonEditable"><img style="width: 150px;" src="http://www.cadolphmoores.com/storage/white_ribbon.jpg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1267824313685" alt="" /></span>Best Foreign Language Film</strong> - Got to go with the Krauts this year.<br />Winner: <em>The White Ribbon<br /></em><br /><strong><span class="full-image-float-right ssNonEditable"><img style="width: 125px;" src="http://www.cadolphmoores.com/storage/stewie-griffin.jpg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1267824471686" alt="" /></span>Best Animated Feature Film</strong> - What a bullshit category. And the best actor Oscar goes to&hellip; Stewie Griffin!<br />Winner: <em>Up</em></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 130%;"><strong></strong></span><span style="font-size: 130%;"><strong>And the technicals&hellip;<br /></strong></span><br /><strong>Art Direction</strong><br />Winner: <em>Avatar</em><br /><br /><strong>Cinematography</strong><br />Winner: <em>Avatar</em><br /><br /><strong>Costume Design</strong><br />Winner: <em>The Young Victoria<br /></em><br /><strong><span class="full-image-float-right ssNonEditable"><img style="width: 150px;" src="http://www.cadolphmoores.com/storage/cove1.jpg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1267824381245" alt="" /></span>Documentary</strong><br />Winner: <em>The Cove</em><br /><br /><strong>Film Editing</strong><br />Winner: <em>The Hurt locker</em><br /><br /><strong>Makeup</strong><br />Winner: <em>Star Trek</em><br /><br /><strong>Original Score</strong><br />Winner: <em>Up</em><br /><br /><strong>Original Song</strong><br />Winner: &ldquo;The Weary Kind&rdquo;, <em>Crazy Heart</em><br /><br /><strong><span class="full-image-float-right ssNonEditable"><img src="http://www.cadolphmoores.com/storage/Avatar.jpg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1267824406582" alt="" width="150" height="115" /></span>Sound Editing</strong><br />Winner: <em>Avatar</em><br /><strong><br />Sound Mixing</strong><br />Winner: <em>Avatar<br /></em><strong><br />Visual Effects</strong><br />Winner: <em>Avatar </em><br /><br /></p>]]></content:encoded></rss:item><rss:item rdf:about="http://www.cadolphmoores.com/blog/2010/3/3/moon.html"><rss:title>Moon</rss:title><rss:link>http://www.cadolphmoores.com/blog/2010/3/3/moon.html</rss:link><dc:creator>C. Adolph Moores</dc:creator><dc:date>2010-03-03T16:10:07Z</dc:date><dc:subject></dc:subject><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="full-image-float-left ssNonEditable"><span><img style="width: 250px;" src="http://www.cadolphmoores.com/storage/moon-poster.jpg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1267633411494" alt="" /></span></span>Interesting bit of lunar paranoia from the fruit of David Bowie&rsquo;s loins (had to be careful with the wording on that sentence, I can tell you), Duncan Jones.<br /><a href="http://www.sonypictures.com/classics/moon/trailer.html"><em>Moon</em></a> is sort of <em>Solaris</em> meets <em>2001</em> meets <em>Silent Running</em> with a little of John Carpenter&rsquo;s overrated cult hit <em>Dark Star</em> thrown in for the film&rsquo;s small dash of humor.<br />Sam Rockwell plays Sam, a working man on the moon, hired by an energy conglomerate to oversee its helium excavations on Earth&rsquo;s favorite satellite. In this not too distant future man has overcome his fossil fuel woes and the planet is - by the standards of the company&rsquo;s press releases anyway - a carefree, energy efficient and wonderful place to live. Which, given the bloodlust for oil these days, sounds like a pretty reasonable assessment of a world with energy options.<br />Sam has been stationed alone at the processing facility for almost three years now and his stint is nearly up. His days consist primarily of maintaining the equipment on base, venturing out on the lunar surface to check on the automated roving harvesters and trying to keep a sense of sanity amidst the isolation and loneliness.<br />He is assisted by a do-all computer named &ldquo;GERTY&rdquo; (voiced by Kevin Spacey), his co-worker and ersatz friend, that is frightfully reminiscent of HAL from <em>2001</em>. But Jones&rsquo; script is a bit cleverer than sheer homage and veers from this obvious technophobia into less explored territory. Namely, and without being too ambitious, the philosophical notions of not only &ldquo;what&rdquo; it is to be human, but &ldquo;who&rdquo; we are as individuals. <br />SPOILER ALERT: we don&rsquo;t really ever find out, which is why <em>Moon</em> outshines most of the sci-fi dreck out there.<br /><span class="full-image-float-right ssNonEditable"><span><img style="width: 175px;" src="http://www.cadolphmoores.com/storage/moon-movie-image-1.jpg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1267633442211" alt="" /></span></span>It&rsquo;s a plaintive meditation on the self that keeps you on an intellectual edge throughout. Is all the paranoia justified? Is the energy company a nefarious entity with ulterior motives? What about GERTY&lsquo;s loyalties? Is <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm1512910/">Jones</a> making some grand socio-political/economic statement about the dehumanization of the worker in contemporary corporate culture? Is he exploring the boundaries of human consciousness? Or are all of the strange happenings simply due to the fact that Sam has lost his fucking mind from what Ren and Stimpy called &ldquo;<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3ItuafgPm4k">Space Madness</a>&rdquo;?<br />And my own personal question outside the parameters of this most enjoyable film &ndash; is <a href="http://www.samrockwell.net/">Sam Rockwell</a> the weirdest actor working in Hollywood today?</p>]]></content:encoded></rss:item><rss:item rdf:about="http://www.cadolphmoores.com/blog/2010/3/1/the-russians-are-still-coming.html"><rss:title>The Russians Are Still Coming!</rss:title><rss:link>http://www.cadolphmoores.com/blog/2010/3/1/the-russians-are-still-coming.html</rss:link><dc:creator>C. Adolph Moores</dc:creator><dc:date>2010-03-01T16:52:27Z</dc:date><dc:subject></dc:subject><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I've made it to the big time on the international email sex circuit! This is my second missive in two weeks and came from Hallie Stewart via a hotmail account. My future second Bolshie bride, Liliya, is not quite as fluent in English as my first Slavic honeybun, Irina, but I like her eagerness to please. My favorite bits in the email are in bold:</p>
<p><em>Hi my new friend! <br /><br /> I only wished to write to you the letter and to tell as in general my letter got to you! First I would like to speak a little about myself my name is Liliya to me 28 years I live in Russian Federation to Kanash. photo in the appendix to the letter . I was in agency of </em><em> acquaintance and to me <strong>advised yours e-mail the address I do not know whence they him took</strong> but they gave me yours e-mail that I could have acquaintance to you. And I only wanted that you have spent about 10 minutes both looked my a photo and my data and<strong> received from you the answer you would like to have acquaintance to me </strong>or you only would not like this? <strong>Tell to me I so only the nobility it much would like.</strong> Also I shall wait much your answer. I started to search the man as to me very alone and 28 years and I do not have man if you wish to begin with me correspondence or easier to begin acquaintance tell to me your answer. <strong>I shall wait much!</strong> I hope your new friend well I hope that I can become for you friend Liliya! Can you <strong>send me you photo and story life</strong> on my e-mail: XXXXXXXXX@juno.com </em>(Deletion mine)<br /><em><br /> P. S. My photo and all data are in archive.</em> <br /> <img src="http://s002.radikal.ru/i199/1002/60/5cb9feb9420e.jpg" alt="" /></p>]]></content:encoded></rss:item></rdf:RDF>